MCGEE
v.
MISSISSIPPI

U.S. | 1949-10-10
No. 238
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
338 U.S. 805 Supreme Court of the United States (1949) Caution
Cited by 10 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Am. Commc'ns Assn. v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382 (U.S. 1950)
    …ed that its First Amendment rights were violated by a municipal zoning ordinance preventing the building of churches in certain residential areas. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Porterville, 338 U. S. 805 (1949). And recent cases in this Court involving contempt by publication likewise have no meaning if imminent danger of national peril is the criterion.12 On the contrary, however, the right of the public to be protected from evils of conduct, ev…
  • Winters v. Cook, 489 F.2d 174 (5th Cir. 1973)
    …476 (1936); Patton v. State, 201 Miss. 410, 29 So. 2d 96, rev’d, 332 U.S. 463, 68 S.Ct. 184, 92 L.Ed. 76 (1947); Gipson v. State, 203 Miss. 434, 35 So. 2d 327, 36 So. 2d 154 (1948); McGee v. State, 207 Miss. 120, 40 So. 2d 160 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 805, 70 S.Ct. 77, 94 L.Ed. 487 (1950); Flowers v. State 209 Miss. 86, 41 So. 2d 352 (1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 946, 70 S.Ct. 800, 94 L.Ed. 1360 (1950); Ferrell v. State, 208 Miss. 539, 45 So. 2d 127 (1950); Seay v. State, 212 Miss. 712, 55 So. 2d 43…
  • …, supra (ban on use of peyote), with Braunfeld v. Brown, supra (Sunday closing law does not prevent Orthodox Jew from observing the Sabbath); Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. City of Porterville, 90 Cal.App.2d 656, 203 P. 2d 823, appeal dismissed, 338 U.S. 805, 70 S.Ct. 78, 94 L.Ed. 487 (1949) (free exercise clause not violated where zoning regulations exclude churches from residential areas). The “booth” rule is not merely a “slight inconvenience” to the faithful, Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. [*444]…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw