BINGAMAN, ADMINISTRATOR,
v.
REHN ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS JOHN P. MAINELLI CONSTRUCTION CO.

U.S. | 1949-10-10
No. 250
338 U.S. 806 Supreme Court of the United States (1949) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Louisiana, 339 U.S. 699 (U.S. 1950)
    …tates and for a bill of particulars. The United States moved for judgment. The demurrer was overruled, Louisiana’s motions denied, and the motion of the United States for judgment was denied, Louisiana being given 30 days in which to file an answer. 338 U. S. 806. In her answer Louisiana admits that “the United States has paramount rights in, and full dominion and power over, the lands, minerals and other things underlying the Gulf of Mexico adjacent to the coast of Louisiana, to the extent of all governmen…
  • United States v. Texas, 339 U.S. 707 (U.S. 1950)
    …ourt. She also moved for a more definite statement or for a bill of particulars and for an extension of time to answer. The United States then moved for judgment. These various motions were denied and Texas was granted thirty days to file an answer. 338 U. S. 806. Texas in her answer, as later amended, renews her objection that this case is not one of which the Court has original jurisdiction; denies that the United States is or ever has been the owner of the lands, minerals, etc., underlying the Gulf of Me…
  • United States v. Louisiana, 446 U.S. 253 (U.S. 1980)
    …ested leave was granted. United States v. Louisiana, 337 U. S. 902 (1949). Louisiana was directed to answer. 337 U. S. 928 (1949). The State, however, filed a demurrer and motions to dismiss and for other relief. These were overruled and denied. 338 U. S. 806 (1949). Louisiana then did answer, placing in issue the claims of the United States and asserting affirmative defenses. The plaintiff’s responsive motion for judgment was set down for argument. The Court ruled that United States v. California, 332…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw