STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
UNITED STATES
338 U.S. 808
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Legislative Process cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Doucette v. Vincent, 194 F.2d 834 (1st Cir. 1952)…e under the Jones Act, and suit for unseaworthiness under the general maritime law, see 4 Benedict on Admiralty (6th ed. 1940) § 612 at page 199 et seq. See also McCarthy v. American Eastern Corp., 3 Cir., 1949,175 F. 2d 724, certiorari denied 1949, 338 U.S. 808, 70 S.Ct. 144, 94 L.Ed. 532. . “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions wherein the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and arises under the Constitution, laws…
-
Power Test Petroleum Distribs., Inc. v. Calcu GAS, Inc., 754 F.2d 91 (2d Cir. 1985)…Texaco, Inc., 630 F. 2d 46, 56-57 (2d Cir.1980). Even if all these elements have been proven, there may still exist an adequate justification for the tie-in. Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 337 U.S. 293, 69 S.Ct. 1051, 93 L.Ed. 1371, reh. denied, 338 U.S. 808 (1949). Ill In this case, the dispositive question — the primary one to consider — is whether two separate products exist. Appellant asserts that the trademark (the “tying” product) and gasoline (the “tied” product) are two separate products capab…