EUREKA WILLIAMS CORP.

v.

SYNCROMATIC CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Keto v. United States, 189 F.2d 247 (8th Cir. 1951)
  …nd that the defects relied upon to invalidate the sentence were formal rather than substantial, that no prejudice to the defendant had been shown, and that the attack came too late. See United States v. Bent, 8 Cir., 175 F. 2d 397, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 829, 70 S.Ct. 79, rehearing denied 338 U.S. 896, 70 S.Ct. 238; Thomas v. United States, 8 Cir., 188 F. 2d 6. It seems advisable to state as definitely as possible the rule which precludes a defendant, after conviction, from attacking collaterally the su…
• United States v. Smith, 591 F.2d 1105 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …tice. 1 C. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 142, at 311 (1969) (citing United States v. Universal CIT Credit Corp., 344 U.S. 218, 221, 43 S.Ct. 227, 97 L.Ed. 260 (1952) and United States v. Bent, 175 F. 2d 397, 400 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 829, 70 S.Ct. 79, 94 L.Ed. 504 (1949)). Professor Wright correctly states, however, An indictment or information charging the same offense in more than one count is multiplicitous, but this also is not fatal and does not require dismissal of the indi…
• Claudiatte Pierce v. Cook & Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 720 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …nt grounds for the federal court to decline to exercise its jurisdiction to decide a diversity case properly before it. Holt v. King, 250 F. 2d 671 (10th Cir. 1957); and see Preston v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 174 F. 2d 10 (7th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 829, 70 S.Ct. 80, 94 L.Ed. 504 (1949). And we have held that the views of a federal district judge, who is a resident of the state where the controversy arose in a case involving interpretations of the law of the state, carry extraordinary persuasive fo…