WALKER

v.

RAGEN, WARDEN; BOSCIO V. RAGEN, WARDEN; VILLASENOR V. RAGEN, WARDEN; ROHDE V. ILLINOIS; MURPHY V. RAGEN, WARDEN; COX V. ILLINOIS; FERGUSON V. RAGEN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Gusik v. Schilder, 340 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1950)
  …is available was existent at the time resort was had to the federal courts or was subsequently created, as indeed is implicit in cases from a state court whose review we denied pending exhaustion of a newly created state remedy. See Walker v. Ragen, 338 U. S. 833; Marks v. Ragen, 339 U. S. 926. Such a principle of judicial administration is in no sense a suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. It is merely a deferment of resort to the writ until other corrective procedures are shown to be futile. An argume…
• Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1951)
  …26-832. In a number of recent cases in which other Illinois procedures were invoked, this Court has denied certiorari with the express statement that denial was without prejudice to petitioners’ proceeding under the new Act. E. g., Walker v. Ragen, 338 U. S. 833 (1949). E. g., People v. Supero, No. 1169, and People v. Gehant, No. 1146, both cases decided by the. Illinois Supreme Court on May 24, 1951. Certiorari was also denied in these cases. 342 U. S. 836, 840 (1951). See Yakus v. United States, 321 U.…
• United States ex rel. Thomas Kling v. LaVALLEE, 306 F.2d 199 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …. § 2254 is satisfied by one exhaustion; al- • ways to require a second, not to speak of a third or a fourth, might well invite the reproach that it is the prisoner rather than the state remedy that is being exhausted. I do not read Walker v. Ragen, 338 U.S. 833, 70 S.Ct. 37, 94 L.Ed. 507 (1949), and Marks v. Ragen, 339 U.S. 926, 70 S.Ct. 613, 94 L.Ed. 1347 (1950), as going so far. See my dissent from the denial of a certificate of probable cause and leave to appeal in forma pauperis in United States ex rel…