EPPLE

v.

DUFFY, WARDEN; WHELAN V. UNITED STATES; WILDE V. LOUISIANA; GAY V. FIDELITY UNION TRUST CO., EXECUTOR; SHOTKIN ET AL. V. DENVER PUBLISHING CO. ET AL.; REEVES V. GEORGIA; WALLACE V. UNITED STATES; EDELMAN V. CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1949-10-10

Nos. 66, Misc.; No. 417, Misc.; No. 440, Misc.; No. 581, Misc.; No. 598, Misc.; No. 628, Misc.; No. 629, Misc.; No. 666, Misc.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

338 U.S. 842 Supreme Court of the United States (1949) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Williams v. United States, 188 F.2d 41 (D.C. Cir. 1951)

…ot tender the filing fee. In the circumstances we think the communication should be treated as submitted in time. Wallace v. United States, 8 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 112, certiorari denied, 337 U.S. 947, 69 S.Ct. 1505, 93 L.Ed. 1749, rehearing denied, 338 U.S. 842, 70 S.Ct. 30. Cf. Remine v. United States, 6 Cir., 1947, 161 F. 2d 1020; Oddo v. United States, 2 Cir., 1949, 171 F. 2d 854. Accordingly the petition to prosecute the appeal will be granted, the motion to dismiss will be denied, and the clerk of…
West v. United States, 222 F.2d 774 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

…ot tender the filing fee. In the circumstances we think the communication should be treated as submitted in time. Wallace v. United States, 8 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 112, certiorari denied, 337 U.S. 947, 69 S.Ct. 1505, 93 L.Ed. 1749, rehearing denied, 338 U.S. 842, 70 S.Ct. 30, 94 L.Ed. 515. Cf. Remine v. United States, 6 Cir., 1947, 161 F. 2d 1020; Oddo v. United States, 2 Cir., 1949, 171 F. 2d 854. [188 F. 2d at page 42] Cf. Wallace v. United States, 174 F. 2d 112 (8th Cir.), certiorari denied, 337 U.S. 9…

1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw