GARSSON

v.

UNITED STATES; AND GARSSON V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Avondale Marine Ways, Inc. v. Henderson, 346 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1953)
  …Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed. Davis v. Department of Labor, 317 U. S. 249; Kaiser Co. v. Baskin, 340 U. S. 886; Baskin v. Industrial Accident Commission, 338 U. S. 854; Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, 335 U. S. 874. Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.…
• W. Boat BLDG. Co. v. O'Leary, 198 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1952)
  …Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, supra, and Davis v. Department of Labor, etc., supra,” and accordingly annulled the order of the Commission dismissing petitioner’s application for state compensation. This decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court in 338 U.S. 854, 70 S.Ct. 99, 94 L.Ed. 523. The decisions in the Moores and Baskin cases, say appellants, indicate that the Supreme Court has “greatly broadened the rule of the Davis case,” and it is their contention that the Davis “twilight zone” doctrine, as sub…
• Mich. Mut. Liab. Co. & Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. Arrien, 344 F.2d 640 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …lding that admiralty lacks jurisdiction of a claim for damages when a vessel strikes a bridge, should have no relevance in deciding whether a stevedore is entitled to compensation for a personal injury. See also Baskin v. Industrial Accident Comm’n, 338 U.S. 854, 70 S.Ct. 99, 94 L.Ed. 523 (1949), vacating and remanding 89 Cal.App.2d 632, 201 P. 2d 549 (1949), and suggesting that the “twilight zone” concept of Davis v. Department of Labor, etc., 317 U.S. 249, 63 S.Ct. 225, 87 L.Ed. 246 (1942), applies even w…