BASKIN
v.
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION ET AL.
BASKIN
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION ET AL.
338 U.S. 854
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. It appears that the decision of this Court in Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, 335 U. S. 874, affirming the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 323 Mass. 162, 80 N. E. 2d 478, was not available to the District Court of Appeal at the time of its consideration of this cause. The judgment is vacated and the cause remanded to the District Court of Appeal for reconsideration in the light of Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, supra, and Davis v. Department of Labor, 317 U. S. 249. See Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U. S. 551; State Tax Comm’n v. Van Cott, 306 U. S. 511.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Avondale Marine Ways, Inc. v. Henderson, 346 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1953)…Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed. Davis v. Department of Labor, 317 U. S. 249; Kaiser Co. v. Baskin, 340 U. S. 886; Baskin v. Industrial Accident Commission, 338 U. S. 854; Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, 335 U. S. 874. Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.…
-
W. Boat BLDG. Co. v. O'Leary, 198 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1952)…Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, supra, and Davis v. Department of Labor, etc., supra,” and accordingly annulled the order of the Commission dismissing petitioner’s application for state compensation. This decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court in 338 U.S. 854, 70 S.Ct. 99, 94 L.Ed. 523. The decisions in the Moores and Baskin cases, say appellants, indicate that the Supreme Court has “greatly broadened the rule of the Davis case,” and it is their contention that the Davis “twilight zone” doctrine, as sub…
-
Mich. Mut. Liab. Co. & Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. Arrien, 344 F.2d 640 (2d Cir. 1965)…lding that admiralty lacks jurisdiction of a claim for damages when a vessel strikes a bridge, should have no relevance in deciding whether a stevedore is entitled to compensation for a personal injury. See also Baskin v. Industrial Accident Comm’n, 338 U.S. 854, 70 S.Ct. 99, 94 L.Ed. 523 (1949), vacating and remanding 89 Cal.App.2d 632, 201 P. 2d 549 (1949), and suggesting that the “twilight zone” concept of Davis v. Department of Labor, etc., 317 U.S. 249, 63 S.Ct. 225, 87 L.Ed. 246 (1942), applies even w…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Davis v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. of the State of Wash., 317 U.S. 249 (U.S. 1942)
- Minnesota v. Nat'l TEA Co., 309 U.S. 551 (U.S. 1940)
- State TAX Comm'n v. Van Cott, 306 U.S. 511 (U.S. 1939)
- Wheeler v. Reid, 335 U.S. 874 (U.S. 1948)