SIMMONS

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Darcy v. Handy, 351 U.S. 454 (U.S. 1956)
  …rial, denied; appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, conviction affirmed, 362 Pa. 259, 66 A. 2d 663; petition for habeas corpus to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, denied, without opinion; petition for certiorari to review those judgments, denied, 338 U. S. 862; applications to the Pennsylvania Board of Pardons for commutation of sentence, denied; second petition for habeas corpus to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court filed April 2, 1951, raising for the first time the constitutional questions now before us; o…
• United States ex rel. Darcy v. Handy, 203 F.2d 407 (3d Cir. 1953)
  …reme Court of Pennsylvania and the judgment of the court below was affirmed, Mr. Justice Jones dissenting. See Commonwealth v. Darcy, 362 Pa. 259, 66, A. 2d 663. An application for certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States was denied. See 338 U.S. 862, 70 S.Ct. 96, 94 L.Ed. 528. Darcy next filed a petition for habeas corpus to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. This was the first petition for habeas corpus filed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. It was denied without opinion. An application…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• United States ex rel. Cleveland Thompson v. DYE, 221 F.2d 763 (3d Cir. 1955)
  …Pa. 275, 277, 35 A. 2d 70, 71. . “It is true * * * that the question of intoxication was important in connection with the determination of the penalty * * Commonwealth v. Simmons, 1949, 361 Pa. 391, 404, 65 A. 2d 353, 359, certiorari denied, 1949, 338 U.S. 862, 70 S.Ct. 96, 94 L.Ed. 528. . The opening language of the trial court on this point was: “Now, members of the jury, at this point I desire to call to your attention the effect of the drunkenness of this defendant, or that he was under the influenc…