SCHUMAN
v.
HEINZE, WARDEN
SCHUMAN
HEINZE, WARDEN
338 U.S. 863
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCAW v. Fase, 216 F.2d 700 (9th Cir. 1954)…asting Corp. v. Stokes, 1941, 180 Tenn. 677, 177 S.W. 2d 837, in which a statute of Tennessee levying a tax on gross receipts was applied to a domestic broadcasting company. Beard v. Vinsonhaler, 1949, 215 Ark. 389, 221 S.W. 2d 3, appeal dismissed, 338 U.S. 863, 70 S.Ct. 146, 94 L.Ed. 529, rehearing denied 338 U.S. 896, 70 S.Ct. 239, 94 L.Ed. 551, in which a license tax on the business of radio broadcasting and on persons soliciting advertising for radio was sustained. Interpreting the statute as a valid e…