DYE, WARDEN,

v.

JOHNSON

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Jackson v. Bishop, 404 F.2d 571 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …, 388 U.S. 920, 87 S.Ct. 2142, 18 L.Ed.2d 1367; Fulwood v. Clemmer, 206 F.Supp. 370, 379 (D.D.C. 1962); Wright v. McMann, supra, 387 F. 2d 519, 525-526 (2 Cir. 1967); Johnson v. Dye, 175 F. 2d 250, 255-256 (3 Cir. 1949), rev’d on procedural grounds, 338 U.S. 864, 70 S.Ct. 146, 94 L.Ed. 530; Harper v. Wall, 85 F.Supp. 783 (D.N.J. 1949); Application of Middlebrooks, 88 F.Supp. 943, 951-952 (S.D.Cal.1950), rev’d on procedural grounds, 188 F. 2d 308 (9 Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 862, 72 S.Ct. 90, 96 L.E…
• United States v. Rosenberg, 195 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1952)
  …tempt to electrocute had failed for [*608] mechanical reasons, would be so cruel and unusual as to violate the due process clause, even if authorized by the Louisiana statute. In Johnson v. Dye, 3 Cir., 175 F. 2d 250, 256, reversed on other grounds, 338 U.S. 864, 70 S.Ct. 146, 94 L.Ed. 530, the court called the treatment of Georgia chain-gang prisoners “cruel and unusual punishment” and so a violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Perhaps it can be said that that treatment was so co…
• Sweeney v. Woodall, 344 U.S. 86 (U.S. 1952)
  …a price to pay for the legal principle that before a state prisoner can get federal relief he must exhaust his state [*93] remedies. The enlightened view is indeed the other way. See Johnson v. Dye, 175 F. 2d 250 (which unhappily the Court reversed, 338 U. S. 864); Johnson v. Matthews, 86 U. S. App. D. C. 376, 383-386, 182 F. 2d 677, 684-687; Commonwealth v. Superintendent of County Prison, 152 Pa. Super. 167, 31 A. 2d 576. Certainly there can be no solid objection to the use of habeas corpus to test the le…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114 (U.S. 1944)