SCHMITT ET AL.

v.

WAR EMERGENCY PIPELINES, INC. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Morpul, Inc. v. Glen Raven Knitting Mill, Inc., 357 F.2d 732 (4th Cir. 1966)
  …eded to understand the art involved. The meaning of the disputed term is made so incontrovertibly clear in the file wrapper history that no genuine issue of fact exists. See Smith v. General Foundry Mach. Co., 174 F. 2d 147 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 869, 70 S.Ct. 144 (1949); Inglett & Co. v. Everglades Fertilizer Co., 255 F. 2d 342 (5th Cir. 1958); Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordograph Corp., 169 F. 2d 580 (3d Cir. 1948). Affirmed. . See Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37, 23 L.Ed. 200 (1875); Turini v. A…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Technitrol, Inc. v. Control Data Corp., 550 F.2d 992 (4th Cir. 1977)
  …ment cases, it is only where, under FRCP 56(c), there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Smith v. General Foundry Machine Co., 174 F. 2d 147, 151 (4th Cir. 1949), cert. den. 338 U.S. 869 (1949). It should be employed with great caution, Morpul, Inc. v. Glen Raven, 357 F. 2d 732 (4th Cir. 1966), and is not ordinarily appropriate for the disposition of a patent case. Long v. Arkansas Foundry Co., 247 F. 2d 366 (8th Cir. 1957). As the…
• Graphicana Corp. v. Baia Corp., 472 F.2d 1202 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …ented invention, and to determine that the alleged infringing device does not contain all the elements set forth in the patent claim, or the mechanical equivalents thereof. Smith v. General Foundry Machine Co., 174 F. 2d 147 (4th Cir), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 869, 70 S.Ct. 144, 94 L.Ed. 533 (1949); Villani v. Industrial Shoe Machinery Corp., 210 F.Supp. 298 (D.C.Mass.1962); Brown v. Ford Motor Co., 57 F.Supp. 825 (E.D. Mich.1944). With respect to the summary judgment on the issue of unfair competition, we c…