BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Audubon Soc'y, Inc. v. Watt, 678 F.2d 299 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …was made); Hetherington & Berner, Inc. v. Melvin Pine & Co., 256 F. 2d 103, 107 (2d Cir. 1958) (considering meaning of stipulation in light of its “obvious purpose”); United States ex rel. Hoehn v. Shaughnessy, 175 F. 2d 116 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 338 U.S. 872, 70 S.Ct. 142, 94 L.Ed. 535 (1949) (stipulation “should be construed in the light of its evident purpose,” discerned from circumstances); cf. 3 A. Corbin, Contracts § 545 (1960); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 228(1) (Tent. Draft No. 5, 1970).…
• United States ex rel. Jaegeler v. UGO Carusi, 187 F.2d 912 (3d Cir. 1951)
  …l, Jaegeler had been served with the thirty day order and was in fact paroled during that time to give him the chance, if he desired, of departing voluntarily. United States ex rel. Hoehn v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 175 F. 2d 116, 117, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 872, 70 S.Ct. 142, is also cited by appellant. There, with the same sort of notice to foreign governments involved, the alien did not try to leave this country of his own free will. The court said that, assuming such notice, “ * * * it would not help th…