POTASH

v.

CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• McCALL v. Swain, 510 F.2d 167 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …use at Occoquan, Virginia to procedural fairness of trial held in District).17 See also, e. g., Ex parte Flick, D.D.C., 76 F.Supp. 979, 981 (1948) (dictum), affirmed, sub nom. Flick v. Johnson, 85 [*175] U.S.App.D.C. 70, 174 F. 2d 983, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 879, 70 S.Ct. 158, 94 L.Ed. 539 (1949) (although District Court' may entertain petitions from prisoners confined at Occoquan Workhouse or Lorton Reformatory because “these two institutions are part of the local District of Columbia penal system and are…
• Chambers v. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc., 182 F.2d 747 (3d Cir. 1950)
  …, 191, 74 L.Ed. 696, Mr. Justice Stone stated that “* * * the liability is not incurred where the refusal to pay is in some reasonable degree morally justified * * *.” See Oldfield v. The Arthur P. Fairfield, 9 Cir., 176 F. 2d 429, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 879, 70 S.Ct. 158. The facts of the cited case are strikingly similar to the case at bar. The court held that the seaman could not recover the withheld wages since it was clear that he was responsible for the customs fine against the ship even though h…