HULL
v.
FRISBIE, WARDEN; MACKENNA V. SNYDER, WARDEN; LANCOUR V. MICHIGAN; HEICHT V. MARYLAND; AND CRUSE V. RAGEN, WARDEN
HULL
FRISBIE, WARDEN; MACKENNA V. SNYDER, WARDEN; LANCOUR V. MICHIGAN; HEICHT V. MARYLAND; AND CRUSE V. RAGEN, WARDEN
338 U.S. 884
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56 (U.S. 1950)…o the search was illegal, and the evidence therefore should have been excluded. 176 F. 2d 732. We granted certiorari to determine the validity of the search because of the question’s importance in the administration of the law of search and seizure. 338 U. S. 884. Were the 573 stamps, the fruits of this search, admissible in evidence? If legally obtained, these stamps were competent evidence to show intent under the first count of the indictment, and they were the very things the possession of which was the…
-
Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (U.S. 1950)…841; In re Eckstein, 335 U. S. 851; In re Heim, 335 U. S. 856; In re Dammann, and 4 companion cases, 336 U. S. 922-923; In re Muhlbauer, and 57 companion cases, covering at least 80 persons, 336 U. S. 964; In re Felsch, 337 U. S. 953; In re Buerger, 338 U. S. 884; In re Hans, 339 U. S. 976; In re Schmidt, 339 U. S. 976; Lammers v. United States, 339 U. S. 976. And see also Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789. These cases and the variety of questions they raised are analyzed and discussed by Fairman, Some…