KITCHENS

v.

BIRD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bucky v. Sebo, 208 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1953)
  …oyalties. Thus this decision is an invitation to all in defendants’ shoes to-do their utmost to provoke a patentee to-cancel his license. I would affirm. . Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co., 6 Cir., 174 F. 2d 541, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 892, 70 S.Ct. 243, 94 L.Ed. 548; Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. J. D. Adams Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 105 F. 2d 943; Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R. Co., 2 Cir., 270 F. 518, 524; cf. Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co. v. Formica Insulation Co., 268 U.S. 342,…
• The First Nat'l Bank OF Chicago v. Material Serv. Corp., 597 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …designed to convey that information. The extreme blackness of water at night makes any departure from light rules “one of the most wrecklessly unlawful acts a vessel can commit.” Bradshaw v. The Virginia, 176 F. 2d 526, 530 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 892, 70 S.Ct. 244, 94 L.Ed. 548 (1949). Holcombe suggested that just before the collision no occupant of Hart’s boat was aware they were approaching another craft. Had they seen Material Service’s flotilla, its improper lighting would have made determin…
• The Gen. Tire & Rubber Co. v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 489 F.2d 1105 (6th Cir. 1973)
  ….Ed. 163 (1934); Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp., 233 F. 2d 828, 837 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 891, 77 S.Ct. 128, 1 L.Ed.2d 86 (1956); Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co., 174 F. 2d 541 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 892, 70 S.Ct. 243, 94 L.Ed. 548 (1949); Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc., 298 F.Supp. 435 (W.D.Mich.), aff’d, 430 F. 2d 221 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 939, 91 S.Ct. 932, 28 L.Ed.2d 218 (1969); United States Plywood Corp. v. Gener…