UNITED STATES

v.

SHORELINE COOPERATIVE APARTMENTS, INC. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sharpnack, 355 U.S. 286 (U.S. 1958)
  …ed to free certain local areas from federal rent control either by passing local rent control legislation of their own, or by determining that federal rent control was no longer necessary. See United States v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc., 338 U. S. 897, reversing, per curiam, 84 F. Supp. 660. This Court also has held that Congress may delegate to local legislative bodies broad jurisdiction over Territories and ceded areas provided Congress retains, as it does here, ample power to revise, alter an…
• City OF Detroit v. Murray Corp. of Am., 355 U.S. 489 (U.S. 1958)
  …t the United States had full title to the property not just a bare security interest. But cf. S. R. A. v. Minnesota, 327 U. S. 558, affirming 213 Minn. 487, 7 N. W. 2d 484, and 219 Minn. 493, 18 N. W. 2d 442; Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Wadena County, 338 U. S. 897, affirming 229 Minn. 263, 39 N. W. 2d 164; Offutt Housing Co. v. Sarpy County, 351 U. S. 253. * [Note: This opinion applies also to No. 26, United States v. City of Detroit, ante, p. 466, and No. 37, United States v. Township of Muskegon, ante, p.…
• United States v. Steffan, 338 U.S. 902 (U.S. 1949)
  …Per Curiam: The judgment is reversed. United States v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, 338 U. S. 897.…

Authorities Cited

• Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co., 333 U.S. 138 (U.S. 1948)