SHIELDS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (42 total)

• United States v. United Cont'l Tuna Corp., 425 U.S. 164 (U.S. 1976)
  …merge from the Senate Committee on the Judiciary before the expiration of the 85th Congress. House Report 3; Senate Report 4. Id., at 6. Id., at 2. Senate Report 5, citing Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. United States, 175 F. 2d 490 (CA2), cert. denied, 338 U. S. 899 (1949). Compare Lykes Bros. S. S. Co. v. United States, supra, with States Marine Corp. v. United States, supra. This amendment, which has no bearing on this case, has generally been held to require that those maritime tort claims that were previou…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. AIR Control Prods. OF ST. Petersburg, Inc., 335 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1964)
  …S.Ct. 830, 88 L.Ed. 1007; NLRB v. Wilkening Mfg. Co., 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F. 2d 98; NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 4 Cir., 1958, 257 F. 2d 235; Ohio Power Co. v. NLRB, 6 Cir., 1949, 176 F. 2d 385, 11 A.L.R.2d 243, cert. denied, 1949, 338 U.S. 899, 70 S.Ct. 249, 94 L.Ed. 553; NLRB v. West Kentucky Coal Co., 6 Cir., 1945, 152 F. 2d 198; Semi-Steel Casting Co. v. NLRB, 8 Cir., 1947, 160 F. 2d 388, cert. denied, 1947, 332 U.S. 758, 68 S.Ct. 57, 92 L.Ed. 344; NLRB v. Deutsch Co., 9 Cir., 1959, 26…
• JAS. H. Matthews & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 354 F.2d 432 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …tive, * * * and the possession of any one of the authorities listed in § 2(11) places the employee invested with (such) authority in the supervisory class.” Ohio Power Co. v. N. L. R. B., 176 F. 2d 385, 387, 11 A.L.R.2d 243 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 899, 70 S.Ct. 249, 94 L.Ed. 553. Moreover, § 2(11) “does not require the exercise of the power described for all or any definite part of the employee’s time. It is the existence of the power which determines the classification.” Id., at 388. Accord, N…