UNITED STATES

v.

LOUISIANA; AND UNITED STATES V. TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 396 U.S. 491 (U.S. 1970)
  …n erroneous assumption. The Commission is not required to deal with the subtleties of “good title” before assuming jurisdiction over a § 5 matter. Cf. O. C. Wiley 6 Sons v. United States, 85 F. Supp. 542, 543-545 (D. C. W. D. Va.), aff’d per curiam, 338 U. S. 902 (1949); Walker v. United States, 208 F. Supp. 388, 396 (D. C. W. D. Tex. 1962); Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United States, 287 F. Supp. 374, 392 n. 32 (D. C. S. D. N. Y. 1968), aff’d per curiam, 393 U. S. 479 (1969). And because a Commission order…
• Alleghany Corp. v. James Found. of N.Y., Inc., 214 F.2d 446 (2d Cir. 1954)
  …tute an investigation to determine whether the transfer involved a violation of Secs. 5 (2) and (4) of the Act”. . See, e. g., Watson Bros. Transportation Co. v. Jaffa, 8 Cir., 143 F. 2d 340; O. C. Wiley & Sons, Inc., D.C., 85 F.Supp. 542, affirmed 338 U.S. 902, 70 S.Ct. 308, 94 L.Ed. 554; Cleveland, C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Jackson, 6 Cir., 22 F. 2d 509; Zabarsky v. Flemings, 113 Vt. 200, 32 A. 2d 663; Royal Blue Coaches, Inc., v. Delaware River Coach Lines, Inc., 140 N.J.Eq. 19, 52 A. 2d 763, appeal dis…