SINCLAIR
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1950-01-09
No. 69
338 U.S. 908 Supreme Court of the United States (1950) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The judgment is reversed. United States v. Limehouse, 285 U. S. 424; Swearingen v. United States, 161 U. S. 446.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …is a supervisor if he possesses any one of the powers there described to be exercised in his independent judgment. N. L. R. B. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F. 2d 571 (CA 6, 1948) , cert. denied sub nom. Foreman’s Ass’n v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co., 338 U.S. 908, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949); Ohio Power Co. v. N. L. R. B., 176 F. 2d 385, 11 A.L.R.2d 243 (CA 6, 1949) , cert. denied, 338 U.S. 899, 70 S.Ct. [*88] 249, 94 L.Ed. 553 (1949). We are compelled to conclude that Eastern’s dispatchers are made su…
  • United States v. Keller, 259 F.2d 54 (3d Cir. 1958)
    …cient to sustain the indictment. The language complained of in count 14 refers to memories of sharing a bedroom. But is does not appear from this postal card that this was a reference to an illicit relationship. Cf. Sinclair v. United States, 1950, 338 U.S. 908, 70 S.Ct. 342, 94 L.Ed. 559, reversing per curiam, 3 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 933. Certainly if the reference is to sexual intercourse it is cloaked. Furthermore, the words used possess a negligible appeal to pruriency. We think they do not meet the te…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw