COURANT

v.

INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHERS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY, LOCAL 659, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (U.S. 1986)
  …rty has carried its burden under Rule 56(c),12 its opponent must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts. See DeLuca v. Atlantic Refining Co., 176 F. 2d 421, 423 (CA2 1949) (L. Hand, J.), cert. denied, 338 U. S. 943 (1950); 10A C. Wright, A. Miller, & M. Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure §2727 (1983); Clark, Special Problems [*587] in Drafting and Interpreting Procedural Codes and Rules, 3 Vand. L. Rev. 493, 504-505 (1950). Cf. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Ga…
• Robin Constr. Co. v. United States, 345 F.2d 610 (3d Cir. 1965)
  …place, but in the daily affairs of mankind and "the intensely practical business of litigation they are put aside as conjectural. In the words of Judge Learned Hand in De Luca v. Atlantic Refining Co., 176 F. 2d 421, 423 (2 Cir. 1949), cert. denied 338 U.S. 943, 70 S.Ct. 423, 94 L.Ed. 581 (1950), where doubt was sought to be cast upon records on file in the office of the Secretary of State of New York relating to the appointment of the Secretary as agent for service of process on a foreign corporation: “Tr…
• Middle Atl. Utils. Co. v. S. M. W. Dev. Corp., 392 F.2d 380 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …sider the statute of limitations on a motion to amend. To delay until there is a later motion to dismiss because the claim is time-barred would be a wasteful formality. DeLuca v. Atlantic Refining Co., 176 F. 2d 421, 424 (2 Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 943, 70 S.Ct. 423, 94 L.Ed. 581 (1950); see, Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F. 2d 80, 90 A.L.R.2d 252 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821, 82 S.Ct. 39, 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961). Either the statute of limitations does or does not [*386] bar t…