UNITED STATES EX REL. MOBLEY
v.
HANDY, COMMANDING OFFICER
UNITED STATES EX REL. MOBLEY
HANDY, COMMANDING OFFICER
338 U.S. 945
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Griffith, 265 F.2d 489 (5th Cir. 1959)…the brake was defective”. In the Carter [*493] case, the Affolder case, Myers v. Reading Co., 1946, 331 U.S. 477, 67 S.Ct. 1334, 91 L.Ed. 1615, and O’Donnell v. Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co., 1949, 338 U.S. 384, 70 S.Ct. 200, 94 L.Ed. 187, rehearing denied 338 U.S. 945, 70 S.Ct. 427, 94 L.Ed. 583, the Supreme Court in effect imposed on the trial judge the duty of instructing the jury that the failure of equipment to function is in itself actionable wrong, for the proximate result of which there is liability. Under…