ELGESEM
v.
CRANOR, SUPERINTENDENT
ELGESEM
CRANOR, SUPERINTENDENT
338 U.S. 951
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wild v. State OF Okla., 187 F.2d 409 (10th Cir. 1951)…he defendant by the prosecuting officers in the criminal case. Wagner v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 161 F. 2d 601; Tilghman v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 167 F. 2d 661; Cobb v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 167 F. 2d 888; Story v. Burford, 10 Cir., 178 F. 2d 911, certiorari denied, 338 U.S. 951, 70 S.Ct. 482; Hinley v. Burford, 10 Cir., 183 F. 2d 581. The petition was properly denied. Judgment is affirmed.…
-
Ryles v. United States, 198 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1952)…g and intentional use of perjured testimony violates due process” and voids the judgment. Tilghman v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 167 F. 2d 661, 662; Wild v. State of Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 187 F. 2d 409; Story v. Burford, 10 Cir., 178 F. 2d 911, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 951, 70 S.Ct. 482, 94 L.Ed. 587. The burden rests upon the petitioner to show affirmatively (1) that perjured testimony was used, (2) that it was knowingly, wilfully and intentionally used by the prosecuting officers. Tilghman v. Hunter, supra. It hav…
-
Story v. Waters, 195 F.2d 734 (10th Cir. 1952)…92 L.Ed. 1774. Of six similar actions filed in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, two have reached this court. Story v. State of Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 150 F. 2d 254; Story v. Burford, 10 Cir., 178 F. 2d 911, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 951, 70 S.Ct. 482, 94 L.Ed. 587. This proceeding was designated “A Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis” and was dismissed by the trial court on motion of the Oklahoma Attorney General on the grounds that the court was without jurisdiction to grant…