WILSON

v.

HINMAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Henderson v. State ex rel. LEE, 65 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1953)
  …3 [94 L.Ed. 978]: “ ‘None of these sections can be read as permitting concurrent state regulation of peaceful strikes for higher wages. Congress occupied this field and closed it to state regulation. Plankinton Packing Co. v. Wisconsin Board, 1950, 338 U.S. 953, 70 S.Ct. 491 [94 L.Ed. 588]; La Crosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Board, 1949, 336 U.S. 18, 69 S.Ct. 379 (93 L.Ed. 463); Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York Labor Board, 1947, 330 U.S. 767, 67 S. Ct. 1026, 91 L.Ed. 1234; Hill v. State of Florida ex r…
• Frazier v. Henderson, 2 Fla. Supp. 54 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1952)
  …9 U.S. at page 457: “None of these sections can be read as permitting concurrent state regulation of peaceful strikes for higher wages. Congress occupied this field and closed it to state regulation. Plankinton Packing Co. v. Wisconsin Board, 1950, 338 U. S. 953; LaCrosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Board, 1949, 336 U. S. 18; Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York Labor Board, 1947, 330 U. S. 767; Hill v. State of Florida ex rel. Watson, 1945, 325 U.S. 538.” In the Wisconsin case a distinction was attempted to b…
• Sears v. San Diego Cnty. Dist. Council of Carpenters, 436 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1978)
  …n.” Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York Labor Relations Bd., 330 U. S. 767, 775-777. See n. 16, supra. La Crosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Bd., 336 U. S. 18, 24-26. Plankinton Packing Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Bd., 338 U. S. 953. The apparent objective of the picketing was to pressure an employer into coercing employees into joining the union. This Court has summarily reversed several cases in which the state court purported to regulate labor union activities under provis…