UNITED STATES SMELTING REFINING & MINING CO. ET AL.

v.

LOWE

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Rabouin v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 195 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1952)
  …ot interpolate into the Act restrictions against union activity which Congress has purposely deleted. N. L. R. B. v. National Maritime Union of America, 2 Cir., 175 F. 2d 686, 690, certiorari denied National Maritime Union of America v. N. L. R. B., 338 U.S. 954, 70 S.Ct. 492, 94 L.Ed. 589. The union cannot have committed an unfair labor practice under this section in regard to those employers who refused to handle Rabouin’s shipments under the terms of the area agreement provision relating to cargo shippe…
• Stauffer v. Exley, 184 F.2d 962 (9th Cir. 1950)
  …then the conclusions heretofore arrived at by the district court will be required. We think justice to the litigants requires that they be permitted a new trial of the question of jurisdiction. United, States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. Lowe, 338 U.S. 954, 70 S.Ct. 493, and dissenting opinion, 9 Cir., 176 F. 2d 813: And appellants should be permitted, should they be so advised, to amend their pleadings as authorized by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1653. The cause is' remanded with directions to the trial court to…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gottfried Baking Co., Inc., 210 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1954)
  …follows that the Union “cause[d] * * * an employer to discriminate against an employee in violation of [Section 8] (a) (3)”, thus violating Section 8(b) (2). N. L. R. B. v. National Maritime Union of America, 2 Cir., 175 F. 2d 686, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 954, 70 S.Ct. 492, 94 L.Ed. 589. Nor is it of consequence, as the respondents contend, that each of the contracts contained a “saving clause,” the intended effect of which was to salvage as much union security as possible should the preferential hiring…