CARPET, LINOLEUM & RESILIENT FLOOR DECORATORS' UNION, LOCAL NO. 596, A. F. OF L., ET AL.
v.
DAYTON COMPANY
CARPET, LINOLEUM & RESILIENT FLOOR DECORATORS' UNION, LOCAL NO. 596, A. F. OF L., ET AL.
DAYTON COMPANY
339 U.S. 906
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the court below is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Pinellas Cnty. Classroom Teachers Ass'n, Inc. v. The Bd. OF Pub. Instruction OF Pinellas Cnty., 214 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1968)…me time laying claim to their positions and asserting the right to go back to work on terms more acceptable to them. This, indeed, was a typical strike. Dayton Co. v. Carpet, etc. Union, Local No. 596, AFL, 229 Minn. 87, 39 N.W. 2d 183, cert. denied 339 U.S. 906, 70 S.Ct. 570, 94 L.Ed. 1334 (1949); State ex rel. Frazier v. Coleman, 156 Fla. 413, 23 So. 2d 477 (1945). [*38] The conclusion is almost inescapable that the action announced by members of appellant C.T.A. was a strike by any standard. It was a str…