WONG YANG SUNG

v.

MCGRATH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., ANTE, P. 33

Citator

Cited By

• Int'l Bhd. OF Elec. Workers, Local Union NO. 474, AFL-CIO v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 814 F.2d 697 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  …oo diffuse, ephemeral, and ultimately unaccountable ...” to provide a basis for statutory construction. Advanced Micro Devices v. CAB, 742 F. 2d 1520, 1541 (D.C.Cir.1984). Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U.S. 33, 70 S.Ct. 445, 94 L.Ed. 616 modified, 339 U.S. 908, 70 S.Ct. 564, 94 L.Ed. 1336 (1950), is also on point. The issue there was whether the newly passed Administrative Procedure Act applied to deportation hearings. The Immigration Department, after an adverse decision in district court, sought [*719]…
• Marathon OIL Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 564 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …Administrator, 509 F. 2d 243, 245 (9th Cir. 1975); Reed v. Morton, 480 F. 2d 634, 643 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1064, 94 S.Ct. 571, 38 L.Ed.2d 469 (1973). But see Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U.S. 33, 70 S.Ct. 445, 94 L.Ed. 616, modified, 339 U.S. 908, 70 S.Ct. 564, 94 L.Ed. 1336 (1950). However, if a statute provides for a hearing, similar weight should not typically be accorded to Congress’ failure to specify that determinations must be made “on the record.”31 The legislative history of the AP…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Aguilera-Enriquez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 516 F.2d 565 (6th Cir. 1975)
  …quate protection during the deportation process.2 Yamataya v. Fisher (The Japanese Immigrant Case), 189 U.S. 86, 100, 23 S.Ct. 611, 47 L.Ed. 721 (1903); Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U.S. 33, 49-51, 70 S.Ct. 445, 94 L.Ed. 616 modified on rehearing, 339 U.S. 908, 70 S.Ct. 564, 94 L.Ed. 1336 (1950). The test for whether due process requires the appointment of counsel for an indigent alien is whether, in a given case, the assistance of counsel would be necessary to provide “fundamental fairness — the touchst…