BLANCHARD MACHINE CO.

v.

RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION PRICE ADJUSTMENT BOARD

Citator

Cited By

• Brotherhood OF Railroad Trainmen v. Cent. OF Ga. Ry. Co., 415 F.2d 403 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …Renegotiation Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1191(e) that a determination “shall not be reviewed or redetermined by any court or agency”, Blanchard Mach. Co. v. R. F. C. Price Adjustment Board, 1949, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 361, 177 F. 2d 727, cert. denied, 339 U.S. 912, 70 S.Ct. 571, 94 L.Ed. 1338, allowed review of jurisdictional questions. In United States v. California Eastern Line, 1955, 348 U.S. 351, 75 S.Ct. 419, 99 L.Ed. 383, the Court held that the question whether a contract was renegotiable was reviewabl…
• Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Ltd. & John David Eaton, 234 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …use jurisdiction of cases not within § 1404(a) ■ — cases which should have been brought in a foreign jurisdiction, rather than in the United States. De Sairigne v. Gould, 2 Cir., 1949, 177 F. 2d 515, affirming D.C., 83 F.Supp. 270, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 912, 70 S.Ct. 571, 94 L.Ed. 1338; Latimer v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1950, 91 F.Supp. 469. Whether jurisdiction should be declined is determined by balancing conveniences, but the plaintiff’s choice of forum will not be distur…
• Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. The United States, 374 F.2d 516 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …d 99, 100 (1950); Ring Const. Corp. v. Secretary of War, 85 U.S.App. D.C. 386, 178 F. 2d 714 (1949), cert. denied 339 U.S. 943, 70 S.Ct. 796, 94 L.Ed. 1358; Blanchard Mach. Co. v. RFC, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 361, 177 F. 2d 727, 729-730 (1949), cert. denied 339 U.S. 912, 70 S.Ct. 571, 94 L.Ed. 1338. Plaintiff points out, however, that the validity of a contract is determined as of the date the contract is made, and maintains that if a provision is illegal when the contract was made, it could not be legalized by su…