MONOLITH PORTLAND MIDWEST CO.

v.

RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• Christian v. The United States, 312 F.2d 418 (Ct. Cl. 1963)
  …tion clause and the contract must be read as if it did. College Point Boat Corp. v. United States, supra; De Laval Steam Turbine Co. v. United States, supra; Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. R. F. C., 178 F. 2d 854, 858 (C.A.9, 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 932, 70 S.Ct. 668, 94 L.Ed. 1352 (1950). The question of whether the regulations did govern the present contract depends upon Section 1.102 which limited their applicability to “purchases and contracts made by the Department of Defense * * * for the pr…
• Butz Eng'g Corp. v. The United States, 499 F.2d 619 (Ct. Cl. 1974)
  …endow a governmental agency with any combination of powers and immunities as it sees fit. See FHA v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242, 244, 60 S.Ct. 488, 84 L.Ed. 724 (1940); Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. RFC, 178 F. 2d 854, 858 (9th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 932, 70 S.Ct. 668, 94 L.Ed. 1352 (1950). Whether a governmental corporation, agency, or other type of instrumentality is administered by sound commercial practices or as a bureaucratic boondoggle need not affect the legal status of the entity. The rele…
• Murillo v. Mathews, 588 F.2d 759 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …535, 553, 74 S.Ct. 745, 98 L.Ed. 933 (1954); Aircraft & Diesel Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752, 772, 67 S.Ct. 1493, 91 L.Ed. 1796 (1947); Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 178 F. 2d 854, 858 (9th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 932, 70 S.Ct. 668, 94 L.Ed. 1352 (1950).6 In the instant case appellants have never presented their contention to the SSA or Secretary. Yet' administrative procedures are available to appellants and even their counsel acknowledges that the Secretary ha…