FLOWERS
v.
MISSISSIPPI
FLOWERS
MISSISSIPPI
339 U.S. 946
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by 28 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lassiter v. Northampton Cnty. Bd. of Elections, 360 U.S. 45 (U.S. 1959)…wspapers, periodicals; books, and other printed, matter canvass and debate campaign issues, a State might conclude that only those who are literate should exercise the franchise. Cf. Franklin v. Harper, 205 Ga. 779, 55 S. E. 2d 221, appeal dismissed 339 U. S. 946. It was said last century in Massachusetts that a literacy test was designed to insure an “independent and intelligent” exercise of the right of suffrage.7 Stone v. [*53] Smith, 159 Mass. 413-414, 34 N. E. 521. North Carolina agrees. We do not sit i…
-
Winters v. Cook, 489 F.2d 174 (5th Cir. 1973)…ipson v. State, 203 Miss. 434, 35 So. 2d 327, 36 So. 2d 154 (1948); McGee v. State, 207 Miss. 120, 40 So. 2d 160 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 805, 70 S.Ct. 77, 94 L.Ed. 487 (1950); Flowers v. State 209 Miss. 86, 41 So. 2d 352 (1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 946, 70 S.Ct. 800, 94 L.Ed. 1360 (1950); Ferrell v. State, 208 Miss. 539, 45 So. 2d 127 (1950); Seay v. State, 212 Miss. 712, 55 So. 2d 430 (1951); Durr v. State, 214 Miss. 658, 59 So. 2d 304 (1952); Wheeler v. State, 219 Miss. 129, 63 So. 2d 517, cert.…
-
Watkins v. Green, 548 F.2d 1143 (5th Cir. 1977)…elected by the procedure hereinabove set forth) such motions may and must be filed and must be disposed of before the grand jury becomes such in fact by the administration of the oath, see Flowers v. State, 41 So. 2d 352 (Miss., 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 946, 70 S.Ct. 800, 94 L.Ed. 1360 (1950). These defendants had been bound over to await the action of the grand jury, they were under bond to appear in response to that action, they were represented by privately retained counsel, and the identity of tho…