THOMPSON
v.
ROBINSON, WARDEN, 338 U. S. 950

U.S. | 1950-05-08
Nos. 255, Misc.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
339 U.S. 954 Supreme Court of the United States (1950) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 (U.S. 1953)
    …he first application for certiorari to this Court raised federal constitutional objections to the judgments of the Supreme Court of North Carolina on both direct and collateral attack by certiorari and coram nobis on the judgment of the trial court. 339 U. S. 954. The failure to perfect the appeal came in this way. Upon the coming in of the verdict on June 6, 1949, the petitioners several times moved for a new trial, in each motion reiterating one or the other of the aforementioned federal questions. These…
    1 / 3
  • Daniels v. Allen, 192 F.2d 763 (4th Cir. 1951)
    …t of North Carolina affirming the judgment, but also to the decisions of that court denying the petition for certiorari to ‘bring up the case on appeal and denying permission to file petition for writ of error coram nobis. Daniels v. North Carolina, 339 U.S. 954, 70 S.Ct. 837, 94 L.Ed. 1366. After denial of certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States, appellants again applied to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for permission to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the trial court;…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw