HACKWORTH

v.

HIATT, WARDEN; LOWE V. HUMPHREY, WARDEN; AND LEDER V. CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1951)
  …the effect of the new legislation on the relation between the Board and the Courts of Appeals in the enforcement of the Board’s orders conflicted with those of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit1 we brought both cases here. 339 U. S. 951 and 339 U. S. 962. The clash of opinion obviously required settlement by this Court. [*477] I. Want of certainty in judicial review of Labor Board decisions partly reflects the intractability of any formula to furnish definiteness of content for all the impalpable f…
• Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1950)
  …of Civil Procedure which became effective March 19, 1948.* The United States filed a [*195] motion to dismiss petitioner’s motion. The District Court denied petitioner’s motion and the Court of Appeals affirmed. 178 F. 2d 983. We granted certiorari. 339 U. S. 962. The question is whether the District Court erred in denying the motion for relief under Rule 60 (b). Petitioner and his wife Frieda were natives of Germany. They were naturalized in 1938. They resided, as now, at Taylor, Texas, where petitioner a…
• Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315 (U.S. 1951)
  …s of the City of Syracuse and was sentenced to thirty days in the county penitentiary. The conviction was affirmed by the Onondaga County Court and the New York Court of Appeals, 300 N. Y. 391, 91 N. E. 2d 316 (1950). The case is here on certiorari, 339 U. S. 962 (1950), petitioner having claimed that the conviction is in violation of his right of free speech under the Fourteenth Amendment. In the review of state decisions where First Amendment rights are drawn in question, we of course make an examination…