KING

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Wilson v. Volkswagen OF Am., Inc., 561 F.2d 494 (4th Cir. 1977)
  …nother case, even between the same parties and in the same court, unless the proceedings are put in evidence. * * * ’ ” Ellis v. Cates (4th Cir. 1949) 178 F. 2d 791, 793 (quoting from Morse v. Lewis (4th Cir. 1932) 54 F. 2d 1027, 1029), cert. denied 339 U.S. 964, 70 S.Ct. 999, 94 L.Ed. 1373 (1950), reh. denied 340 U.S. 857, 71 S.Ct. 69, 95 L.Ed. 627 (1950); Guam Investment Company v. Central Building, Inc. (9th Cir. 1961) 288 F. 2d 19, 23. The reason for the rule requiring that the record in such cases be m…
• Concordia v. Bendekovic, 693 F.2d 1073 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …d authorities are not mentioned in Rule 56 and cannot be “classed inferentially among the documents in which extra pleading matters may be presented for purposes of summary judgment”); Ellis v. Cates, 178 F. 2d 791, 793 (4th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 964, 70 S.Ct. 999, 94 L.Ed. 1373 (1950), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 870, 72 S.Ct. 113, 96 L.Ed. 655 (1951) (court should not hesitate to look at its own records to see what they disclose). In the case at bar, the record of the state court proceedings was n…
• Althea G. Williams v. United States, 215 F.2d 800 (9th Cir. 1954)
  …an activity which was in line of “military duty.” A brief reference to some of these cases is justified. A case presenting a situation somewhat comparable to one in the case at bar is King v. United States, 5 Cir., 178 F. 2d 320, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 964, 70 S.Ct. 998, 94 L.Ed. 1373. The “ ‘line of duty’ ” language was used to “more correctly” describe the conduct of military personnel in acting for the Government. United States v. Eleazer, 4 Cir., 177 F. 2d 914, 918, certio-rari denied 339 U.S. 90…