SHOONG ET AL.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
SHOONG ET AL.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
339 U.S. 974
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Per_curiam
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Commissioner v: Korell, decided this day, ante, p. 619.
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (U.S. 1976)…s. 8 Wigmore § 2291, and §2306, p. 590; McCormick §87, p. 175, §92, p. 192; Baird v. Koerner, 279 F. 2d 623 (CA9 1960); Modern Woodmen of America v. Watkins, 132 F. 2d 352 (CA5 1942); Prichard v. United States, 181 F. 2d 326 (CA6), aff’d per curiam, 339 U. S. 974 (1950); Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F. 2d 855 (CA8 1956); United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F. 2d 280 (CA6 1964). As a practical matter, if the client knows that damaging information could more readily be obtained from the attorney following disclo…
-
Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211 (U.S. 1974)…ified, wholly or in part, he has been injured in the free exercise of a right or privilege secured to him by the laws and Constitution of the United States.” Prichard v. United States, 181 F. [*227] 2d 326, 331 (CA6), aff’d due to absence of quorum, 339 U. S. 974 (1950). Every voter in a federal primary election, whether he votes for a candidate with little chance of winning or for one with little chance of losing, has a right under the Constitution to have his vote fairly counted, without its being distort…
-
Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 593 (U.S. 1951)…t, sales representative, or distributor thereof.” United States v. Crescent Amusement Co., 323 U. S. 173, 189 ; United States v. Paramount Pictures, 334 U. S. 131, 166 (Third) ; 85 F. Supp. 881, 895, affirmed sub nom. United States v. Loew’s, Inc., 339 U. S. 974; United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 91 F. Supp. 333, 392 (Aluminum Limited) at 418-419. Cf. Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U. S. 386, 413 et seq. See United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 340 U. S. 76, 89.…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence