MELANSON
v.
MASSACHUSETTS; BLONDIN V. MASSACHUSETTS; AND MORIN V. MASSACHUSETTS

U.S. | 1950-06-05
Nos. 190, Misc.; No. 192, Misc.; No. 194, Misc.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion the petitions should be granted.
339 U.S. 984 Supreme Court of the United States (1950) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Melanson v. O'Brien, 191 F.2d 963 (1st Cir. 1951)
    …trial, and on the petition for a writ of error affirmed the judgment of conviction. The case is reported sub ndm. Commonwealth v. Blondin, 1949, 324 Mass. 564, 87 N.E. 2d 455.1 Certiorari was applied for and denied. Melanson v. Massachusetts, 1950, 339 U.S. 984, 70 S.Ct. 1004, 94 L.Ed. 1387, Justices Black and Douglas noting their opinion that the petition for certiorari should have been granted. Of course we have no way of knowing why certiorari was denied, nor may denial of certiorari be taken as an adve…
  • Melanson v. O'Brien, 203 F.2d 934 (1st Cir. 1953)
    …Judicial Court overruled appellant’s exceptions to the order denying a new trial, and at the same time, on the petition for a writ of error, affirmed the judgment of conviction. Certiorari was applied for and denied. Melanson v. Massachusetts, 1950, 339 U.S. 984, 70 S.Ct. 1004, 94 L.Ed. 1387. Thereafter, Melanson filed in the court below a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court entered an order dismissing the petition and denying the writ, on the ground that it appeared from the face of t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw