GOODALL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Fuller v. United States, 407 F.2d 1199 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …a note 33; Kitchen v. United States, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 277, 278, 221 F. 2d 832, 833 (1955), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 928, 78 S.Ct. 1378, 2 L.Ed.2d 1374 (1958); Goodall v. United States, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 148, 180 F. 2d 397, 17 A.L.R.2d 1070, cert. denied, 339 U.S. 987, 70 S.Ct. 1009, 94 L.Ed. 1389 (1950). . See, e. g., Coleman v. United States, supra note 20; Green v. United States, supra 95 U.S.App.D.C. at 48, 218 F. 2d at 859; Goodall v. United States, supra 86 U.S.App.D.C. at 151, 180 F. 2d at 400. . See San…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Howard v. United States, 389 F.2d 287 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …ncluded offense, even though there is no evidence to support that charge, if the jury returns a verdict of guilty of the greater offense. Goodall v. United States, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 148, 151-152, 180 F. 2d 397, 400-401, 17 A.L.R.2d 1070, cert. denied, 339 U.S. 987, 70 S.Ct. 1009, 94 L.Ed. 1389 (1950).9 Recently, in Austin v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 180, 382 F. 2d 129 (1967), the court held that a federal appellate court has “the power to modify a criminal judgment to reduce the conviction to that of a…
• Coleman v. United States, 295 F.2d 555 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
  …they resolve the conflicting evidence. This is simply a matter of giving the jury the law applicable to the facts of the case as they may be found by the jury. Goodall v. United States, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 148, 151, 180 F. 2d 397, 400, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 987, 70 S.Ct. 1009, 94 L.Ed. 1389. That this general rule applies in this jurisdiction notwithstanding the indictment is for felony murder is clear. As stated by the Supreme Court in Green v. United States: “The suggestion is made that second degree m…

  ← 1 / 2 →