WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY CO.
v.
ROGAN ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court held that the Maryland franchise tax, measured by gross receipts, can constitutionally apply to revenues from transporting goods moving in foreign trade, as long as the tax line is drawn at the water's edge.
Western Maryland Railway, an interstate carrier, challenged the Maryland franchise tax for including revenues from transporting imports and exports. T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Tax Immunity cases and more on FLexlaw
Mr. Justice Douglas delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a companion case to Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, ante, p. 511. This appellant likewise challenges the validity under Art. I, § 10, cl. 2 of the Constitution of the application of the Maryland franchise tax* to the extent that the gross receipts by which the tax is measured include revenues derived from the transportation of goods moving in foreign trade.
Western Maryland Railway Company is an interstate common carrier by rail with lines in Maryland, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. It operates several piers in the port of Baltimore for handling cargoes of coal, ores and general merchandise, as well as a grain elevator. A substantial proportion of Western Maryland’s freight traffic from and to these facilities consists of the transportation of goods imported into or to be exported from the United States.
The present case concerns the taxable years 1945 and 1946. For 1945 Western Maryland reported gross receipts of $33,156,236.74, of which the State Tax Commission, pursuant to the statutory formula, apportioned $13,219,822.62 to Maryland. For 1946 the amounts were $30,844,132.74 and $12,322,817.41 respectively. In subsequent amended returns Western Maryland excluded from taxable receipts the sums of $2,505,322.58 for 1945 and $5,405,559.44 for 1946. It claimed that these amounts represented revenues from the transportation over its lines of exports and imports and were therefore beyond the state’s power to tax. After a hearing, the Commission rejected this contention. Its assessment was sustained, and the case is here on appeal.
What we have said in Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, supra, is dispositive of this case. The present facts illustrate how wide a zone of tax immunity would be created if the contrary holding were made in the Canton R. Co. case. There we were dealing with the handling of exports and imports within a port. Here we have transportation of exports and imports to and from the port. If Maryland were required to grant tax immunity to the services involved in getting the exports to the port and the imports to their destination, so would any other State. The ultimate impact of such a holding is difficult to measure, since manifold services are involved in the movement of exports and imports within the country. Problems of this nature, like many problems in the law, involve the drawing of lines. So far as taxes on activities connected with bringing exports to or imports from the ship are concerned, we think the line must be drawn at the water’s edge. Whether loading and unloading would be exempt is a question we reserve.
Affirmed.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[For opinion of Mr. Justice Jackson, joined by Mr. Justice Frankfurter, reserving judgment in this case and in No. 96, Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, see ante, p. 511.]
*
Md. Ann. Code (1943 Supp.), Art. 81, §§ 94% and 95.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Rose v. Bartle, 871 F.2d 331 (3d Cir. 1989)…mere dictum.18 Moreover, the plaintiffs conceded at oral argument that the weight of authority is consonant with Deary. The plaintiffs, however, point to Cameron v. Fogarty, 806 F. 2d 380 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1016, 107 S.Ct. 1894, 95 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987), in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that because, under common law principles, an action for false arrest cannot be maintained if the arrest was followed by a conviction, conviction is a complete defense t…
-
Dep't of Revenue of Wash. v. Ass'n of Wash. Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (U.S. 1978)…nce policies on them than to the value of loading and unloading ships. The Court expressly noted that it did not need to reach the stevedoring issue. 340 U. S., at 515. It was also reserved in the companion case of Western Maryland R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 520, 522 (1951). We do not reach the question of the applicability of the Michelin approach when a State directly taxes imports or exports in transit. Our Brother Powell, as his concurring opinion indicates, obviously would prefer to reach the issue t…
-
Mead & Mount Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 411 F.2d 1154 (8th Cir. 1969)…). . In each case, the Board, with exceptions noted elsewhere, adopted the findings of the Trial Examiner. As to the weight to be given to the findings of the Trial Examiner, see, Universal Camera Corp. v. National L. R. Bd., 340 U.S. 474, 495-496, 71 S.Ct. 450, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). . Sterling Aluminum Company v. N. L. R. B., 391 F. 2d 713 (8th Cir. 1968); Farmbest, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 370 F. 2d 1015 (8th Cir. 1967); N. L. R. B. v. Superior Sales, Inc., 366 F. 2d 229 (8th Cir. 1966); N. L. R. B. v, Morri…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence