HINTON
v.
MISSISSIPPI
HINTON
MISSISSIPPI
340 U.S. 802
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
[*802] Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by 28 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miller Transporters, Inc. v. The United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 594 F.2d 463 (5th Cir. 1979)….S. 281, 297-98, 95 S.Ct. 438, 448, 42 L.Ed.2d 447, 462 (1974). A new certificate may be in the public interest even when existing carriers will lose revenues. Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United States, 96 F.Supp. 756, 761 (E.D.Va.), aff’d mem., 340 U.S. 802, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L.Ed. 590 (1950). The restriction in the order against traffic originating in Bay and Duval Counties is designed to prevent any serious damage to Motor Fuel’s economic health. Bay County is Motor Fuel’s home base of operations. The…
-
Hilt Truck Line, Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 532 F.2d 1199 (8th Cir. 1976)…ct on those carriers. Existing carriers are without a basis for complaint, however, when the provision of new service is in the public interest. As recognized in Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United States, 96 F.Supp. 756, 761 (E.D.Va.), aff’d mem., 340 U.S. 802, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L.Ed. 590 (1950): Competition among public carriers may be in the public interest and the carrier first in the business has no immunity against future competition. * * * Even though the resulting competition causes a decrease of re…
-
Rca Commc'ns, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 201 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1952)…D.C.1951, 101 F.Supp. 587; Hudson Transit Lines v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1948, 82 F.Supp. 153, affirmed 1949, 338 U.S. 802, 70 S.Ct. 59, 94 L.Ed. 485; Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United States, D.C.E.D.Va.1950, 96 F.Supp. 756, affirmed, 1950, 340 U.S. 802, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L.Ed. 590; Lang Transp. Corporation v. United States, D.C.S.D.Cal.1948, 75 F.Supp. 915; C. E. Hall & Sons v. United States, D.C.Mass.1950, 88 F.Supp. 596. See also Sharfman, The Interstate’ Commerce Commission, Part III-A, pp. 355-3…