UNITED STATES

v.

YELLOW CAB CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Yellow Cab Co., 340 U.S. 543 (U.S. 1951)
  …were denied and the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed those denials. Howey v. Yellow Cab Co., 181 E. 2d 967. On petition of the United States, we granted certiorari after the Capital Transit case, infra, had been decided the other way. 340 U. S. 809. No. 204 — Capital Transit Case. August 4,1947, in the District of Columbia, a passenger on a streetcar was injured by a collision between it and a jeep operated by a United States soldier acting within the scope of his duties. The passenger, char…
• Collins v. Hardyman, 341 U.S. 651 (U.S. 1951)
  …ons, see California Civil Code, Sections 51-54.” 80 F. Supp. 501. 183 F. 2d 308. Other recent cases involving the statute are Viles v. Symes, 129 F. 2d 828; Robeson v. Fanelli, 94 F. Supp. 62; and Ferrer v. Fronton Exhibition Co., 188 F. 2d 954. 340 U. S. 809. 17 Stat. 13. The background of this Act, the nature of the debates which preceded its passage, and the reaction it produced are set forth in Bowers, The Tragic Era, 340-348. R. S. § 5519, under which the prosecution was brought, provided: “If tw…
• Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. Leventritt, 340 U.S. 336 (U.S. 1951)
  …of the decisions in the Courts of Appeals and the importance of the issue in the application of the Public Utility Holding Company Act, we granted the petitions for certiorari filed separately by the company in No. 211 and the Commission in No. 212. 340 U. S. 809. At every stage of this proceeding opportunity has been afforded the holders of the warrants to present their claims and they have been fully presented. Respondent has not, however, brought up the record which was made before the Commission and can…