ERICSON ET AL.

v.

JORGENSEN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Ockert v. Union Barge Line Corp., 190 F.2d 303 (3d Cir. 1951)
  …Heater & Mfg. Co., 2 Cir., 1939, 104 F. 2d 88, 92, 93. . See Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co., 1947, 330 U.S. 212, 217, 67 S.Ct. 752, 91 L.Ed. 849. . Bolten v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 1950, 180 F. 2d 379, 381, certiorari denied, 1950, 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 41. Questioned in 2 Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 912 (1950). . See Young v. Wilky Carrier Corp., 3 Cir., 1945, 150 F. 2d 764, certiorari denied, 1946, 326 U.S. 786, 66 S.Ct. 470, [*305] 90 L.Ed. 477 (affirmance of…
• Acme Process Equip. Co. v. The United States, 347 F.2d 538 (Ct. Cl. 1965)
  …uneration based solely on commissions, is enough to violate the covenant. See Mitchell v. Flintkote Co., 185 F. 2d 1008,1009 (C.A.2,1951); United States v. Paddock, 178 F. 2d 394, 395-396 (C.A.5, 1949), rehearing denied, 180 F. 2d 121, cert. denied, 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 41, 95 L.Ed. 597 (1950). Most tribunals, however, have eschewed any sort of per se rule. To ascertain whether a contingent fee arrangement might tend to “induce improper solicitations,” these courts have chosen to scrutinize the totality…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• LE John Mfg. Co. v. Webb, 222 F.2d 48 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
  …ption does not protect one “who merely receives a contribution to the support of its agency in the form of a contingent fee.” United States v. Paddock, 5 Cir., 178 F. 2d 394, [*51] 395, rehearing denied, 1950, 180 F. 2d 121, certiorari denied, 1950, 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 41, 95 L.Ed. 597. The court added— “The primary decision on this item turns upon the meaning of the word maintained; for present purposes, it is the key word in the exception. If the word is given its usual and ordinary acceptation, and i…