CONSUMERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION

v.

CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Ockert v. Union Barge Line Corp., 190 F.2d 303 (3d Cir. 1951)
  …Heater & Mfg. Co., 2 Cir., 1939, 104 F. 2d 88, 92, 93. . See Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co., 1947, 330 U.S. 212, 217, 67 S.Ct. 752, 91 L.Ed. 849. . Bolten v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 1950, 180 F. 2d 379, 381, certiorari denied, 1950, 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 41. Questioned in 2 Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 912 (1950). . See Young v. Wilky Carrier Corp., 3 Cir., 1945, 150 F. 2d 764, certiorari denied, 1946, 326 U.S. 786, 66 S.Ct. 470, [*305] 90 L.Ed. 477 (affirmance of…
• LE John Mfg. Co. v. Webb, 222 F.2d 48 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
  …ption does not protect one “who merely receives a contribution to the support of its agency in the form of a contingent fee.” United States v. Paddock, 5 Cir., 178 F. 2d 394, [*51] 395, rehearing denied, 1950, 180 F. 2d 121, certiorari denied, 1950, 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 41, 95 L.Ed. 597. The court added— “The primary decision on this item turns upon the meaning of the word maintained; for present purposes, it is the key word in the exception. If the word is given its usual and ordinary acceptation, and i…
• Kirby v. Dole, 736 F.2d 661 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …ntract providing a particular remedy for a party’s breach of the contract does not render that remedy exclusive of all remedies otherwise available for the breach. See, e.g., United States v. Paddock, 178 F. 2d 394, 396 (5th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 41, 95 L.Ed. 597 (1950). Kirby argues that the determination whether the remedy explicitly provided by the contract is exclusive turns on the intent of the parties to the contract and that no such intent is manifested in this case. Kirby…