WALLACE

v.

FOSTER, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By

• Whippler v. Balkcom, 342 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …Cobb v. State, 1962, 218 Ga. 10, 126 S.E. 2d 231, cert. den’d, 371 U.S. 948, 83 S.Ct. 499, 9 L.Ed.2d 497 (waiver of objection to systematic exelusion of Negroes from jury (dictum)); Wallace v. Foster, 1950, 206 Ga. 561, 57 S.E. 2d 920, cert. den’d, 340 U.S. 815, 71 S.Ct. 43, 95 L.Ed.2d 599 (waiver of objections to illegal procurement of testimony by prosecution and denial of fair and impartial trial because of publicity); McKay v. Balkcom, 1948, 203 Ga. 790, 48 S.E. 2d 453, cert. den’d, McKay v. Aderhold,…
• Constance v. Harvey, 215 F.2d 571 (2d Cir. 1954)
  …ng of the petition in bankruptcy, and since under § 70, sub. c of the Bankruptcy Act the Trustee was entitled to be put in the position of an “ideal” hypothetical creditor — Hoffman v. Cream-O-Products, 2 Cir., 180 F. 2d 649, certiorari denied 1950, 340 U.S. 815, 71 S.Ct. 44, 95 L.Ed. 599 — we think his position must prevail over that of the mortgagee-appellant. This leads us to correct our original opinion in this respect, and on this ground to affirm the judgment below. Petition for rehearing denied. Ju…
• In re Todor R. Alikaso-Vich v. Mfrs. Nat'l Bank OF Detroit, 275 F.2d 454 (6th Cir. 1960)
  …e petition in bankruptcy, and since under § 70, sub. (c) of the Bankruptcy Act the Trustee was entitled to be put in the position of an ‘ideal’ hypothetical creditor — Hoffman v. Cream-O-Products, 2 Cir., 1950, 180 F. 2d 649, certiorari denied 1950, 340 U.S. 815, 71 S.Ct. 44, 95 L.Ed. 599, we think his position must prevail over that of the mortgagee-appellant.” The trouble with Constance v. Harvey, in our judgment, was in the retroactive extension of the rights of the trustee in bankruptcy to include thos…