KELLER ET AL.

v.

HALL

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Keele Hair & Scalp Specialists, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 275 F.2d 18 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …ller v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 262 F. 2d 443.8 II. Has the Commission the power to require affirmative disclosure? Petitioners argue, citing Alberty v. Federal Trade Commission, 1950, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238, 182 F. 2d 36, 43, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 818, 71 S.Ct. 49, 95 L.Ed. 601, that the Commission cannot order them to disclose what their product and treatment will not do. The Act states that the term “false advertising” includes “not only representations made or suggested * * * but also the ext…
• The J. B. Williams Co., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 381 F.2d 884 (6th Cir. 1967)
  …does not fall within the sphere of negative advertising, it merely presents to the consumer an opportunity to make an intelligent choice. Petitioners rely on Alberty v. Federal Trade Commission, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238, 182 F. 2d 36, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 818, 71 S.Ct. 49, 95 L.Ed. 601, for the proposition that the Commission cannot order them to disclose what their product will not do. In Alberty, the Court held that the Commission must make certain findings before compelling affirmative disclosure. Th…
• Warner-Lambert Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 562 F.2d 749 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …Hair & Scalp Specialists, Inc. v. FTC, 275 F. 2d 18 (5th Cir. 1960). . Feil v. FTC, 285 F. 2d 879 (9th Cir. 1960). . J.B. Williams Co. v. FTC, 381 F. 2d 884 (6th Cir. 1967). Compare Alberty v. FTC, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238, 182 F. 2d 36, cert. denied, 340 U.S. 818, 71 S.Ct. 49, 95 L.Ed. 601 (1950), discussed in note 52 infra. . In Alberty v. FTC, supra note 51, this court set aside an order similar to the one upheld in J. B. Williams Co. v. FTC, supra note 51. The precise holding of Alberty is disputed. Seve…