BLANCH ET AL.
v.
CORDERO, AUDITOR OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL.
BLANCH ET AL.
CORDERO, AUDITOR OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL.
340 U.S. 819
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Pierce, 235 F.2d 885 (9th Cir. 1956)…hat the court lacked jurisdiction to order the payment of income collected by the government, because such would be a money judgment against the United States. See Arenas v. Preston, 9 Cir., 1950, 181 F. 2d 62, 64, note 4 thereto, certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 819, 71 S.Ct. 50, 95 L.Ed. 602. The government is holding the land, together with the income, as one bundle of rights, in trust for the benefit of the cestui que trust, and the court has equitable jurisdiction to order the trustee to account to the bene…
-
Gately v. Sutton, 310 F.2d 107 (10th Cir. 1962)…In re Green, 141 U.S. 325, 12 S.Ct. 11, 35 L.Ed. 765; Biggs v. Ward, 7 Cir., 212 F. 2d 209. See Daniels v. Thomas, 10 Cir., 225 F. 2d 795, cert. denied 350 U.S. 932, 76 S.Ct. 303, 100 L.Ed. 815; Jones v. Medlock, 10 Cir., 180 F. 2d 658, cert. denied 340 U.S. 819, 71 S.Ct. 50, 95 L.Ed. 602. The opinion of the Supreme Court in In re Green, supra, effectively disposes of Gately’s prayer for relief by writ of mandamus. With respect to the prayer for damages, it is clear that in the disbarment proceeding the Su…