UNITED STATES

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Nuesse v. Camp, 385 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …triae to intervene in a lawsuit of direct significance to the general welfare of the populace has been recognized. See, e. g., People of the State of California v. United States, 180 F. 2d 596, rehearing denied 181 F. 2d 598 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 340 U.S. 826, 71 S.Ct. 61, 95 L.Ed. 607 (1950), where California was held entitled to intervene to protect its policy that water rights be used for the public weal. The court reasoned that if a state may fashion such a statutory policy, it may appear in court to…
• Charlson Realty Co. v. The United States, 384 F.2d 434 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …ble minds can draw but one inference. Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Thompson, 101 F. 2d 301, 304 (8th Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 631, 59 S.Ct. 834, 83 L.Ed. 1514; Wolfgang v. Burrows, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 340, 181 F. 2d 630, 631 (1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 826, 71 S.Ct. 61, 95 L.Ed. 606. In addition to the foregoing, to overcome the strong presumption of the arrival of a letter in due course of the mails, the countervail [*445] ing evidence must show the contrary to be true by direct and positive proof of…
• Ratigan v. NEW York Cent. R.R. Co., 291 F.2d 548 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …seems not to have been clearly decided — certainly the district courts in this circuit have not regarded themselves as confined to the former. Although statements in Cate v. Good Bros., Inc., 3 Cir., 1950, 181 F. 2d 146, 149, certiorari denied 1950, 340 U.S. 826, 71 S.Ct. 62, 95 L.Ed. 607, and in Thedorf v. Lipsey, 7 Cir., 1956, 237 F. 2d 190, 193, cited by Judge Foley and by my brother MEDINA, give some support to the former view, others say that a mixed question of law and fact may be put if the jury is p…