PRUDENCE-BONDS CORP.

v.

SILBIGER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …Scocozza et al. v. Erie R. Co., 337 U. S. 907. Killian v. Pennsylvania R. Co. et al., 338 U. S. 819. Lavender v. Illinois Central R. Co., 338 U. S. 822. Roberts v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co., 340 U. S. 829. Emmick v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 340 U. S. 831. Roberts v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 340 U. S. 832. [*22] Gentry v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., 340 U. S. 853. Moleton v. Union Pacific R. Co., 340 U. S. 932. Healy v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 340 U. S. 935. Ottley v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co…
• In re Hudson & Manhattan R.R. Co., 339 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …ch should bar his attorneys from receiving an allowance for any services [*116] rendered to the estate. See In re Mortgage Guarantee Co., 40 F.Supp. 226, 238 (D.Md.1941); Silbiger v. Prudence Bonds Corp., 180 F. 2d 917, 922-23, 2 Cir., cert, denied, 340 U.S. 831, 71 S.Ct. 37, 95 L.Ed. 610 (1950). As the Commission points out, “the record indicates no problems of shifting interests and contains no indication that the knowledge gained by the applicant was used to assist Mr. Marqusee’s trading.” We agree with…
• Delafield v. Silbiger, 228 F.2d 838 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …prime importance herein because of the penalty inflicted upon another attorney for violation of obligations of loyalty to client. See Silbiger v. Prudence Bonds Corp., 2 Cir., 180 F. 2d 917, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 40, 95 L.Ed. 597; 340 U.S. 831, 71 S.Ct. 37, 95 L.Ed. 610. All the parties and the Master were made fully aware of this problem; so far as is apparent, this had no effect upon the proper presentation of the case, which consisted largely of documentary materials supplied for the…