WILLUMEIT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Williams v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Comm'n, 415 F.2d 922 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …rge to farepayers of any portion whatsoever of the deficiency. Cf. FPC v. Colorado-Interstate Gas Co., supra note 98, 348 U.S. at 497-499, 75 S.Ct. 467, 99 L.Ed. 583; Halsted v. SEC, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 361-362, 182 F. 2d 660, 669-670, cert. denied 340 U.S. 834, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L.Ed. 612 (1950). Moreover, petitioners would not, in their endeavors to support any ground submitted for the Commission’s reconsideration, be confined to precisely the same reasons or argument advanced before the Commission, see De…
• Studebaker Corp. v. Gittlin, 360 F.2d 692 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …g that shareholders have full information before they aid its procurement. We see no reason why, in such a case, the words of the Act should be denied their literal meaning. Cf. Halsted v. SEC, 86 U.S. App.D.C. 352, 182 F. 2d 660, 664, cert. denied, 340 U.S. 834, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L. Ed. 612 (1950); Aranow and Einhorn, Proxy Contests for Corporate Control 70, n. 91 (1957). A far more difficult question is raised by the anti-injunction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which forbids a federal court to grant “an inju…
• Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. Otis, 348 F.2d 798 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
  …e at the time appropriate under its practice.” . Wallach v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 41, 206 F. 2d 486 (1953); Halsted v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 361-362, 182 F. 2d 660, 669-670, cert. denied, 340 U.S. 834, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L.Ed. 612 (1950). Cf. R. A. Holman & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 339 F. 2d 752 (1964); Securities & Exchange Commission v. R. A. Holman & Co., 116 U.S.App.D.C. 279, 323 F. 2d 284, cert. denied, 375…