PANKOLA

v.

WARDEN, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON

Citator

Cited By

• Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 273 (U.S. 1953)
  …ken practice not to note dissent from the Court’s disposition of petitions for certiorari.’ Chemical Bank Co. v. Investors, 343 U. S. 982; Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U. S. 912; Darr v. Burford, 339 U. S. 200, 227; Agoston v. Pennsylvania, 340 U. S. 844; Bondholders, Inc. v. Powell, 342 U. S. 921; Rosenberg v. United States, 344 U. S. 889, 345 U. S. 965. Partial disclosure of votes on successive stages of a certiorari proceeding does not present an accurate picture of what took place. “Mr. Justice…
• United States v. LaVance Greene, 489 F.2d 1145 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …ices dissenting.100 The Supreme Court itself, however, has repeated countless times that a denial of certiorari “carries with it no support of the decision in that case, nor of any of the views in the opinion supporting it.” Agoston v. Pennsylvania, 340 U.S. 844-845, 71 S.Ct. 9, 95 L.Ed. 619 (1950) (opinion of Frankfurter, J.j. Ninth: “[S]anity is not one of the elements of felony murder but lack of sanity may be interposed as a defense.” (Court’s opinion at 1155.) Throughout its opinion the court seems…
• Blaski v. Honorable Julius J. Hoffman, 260 F.2d 317 (7th Cir. 1958)
  …respondent reasoned one way and decided the other. Certainly he had no sound basis for attaching weight to the fact that the Supreme Court has refused to grant certiorari in the cases supporting transfer. See Agoston v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 340 U.S. 844, 845, 71 S.Ct. 9, 95 L.Ed. 619. We have heretofore quoted from Judge Whittaker’s opinion in General Electric Co. v. Central Transit Warehouse Co., D.C., 127 F.Supp. 817, which includes a statement from Foster-Milburn Co. v. Knight, 2 Cir., 181 F. 2…