YATES

v.

BALL; THE ARLINGTON, INC. ET AL. V. MAYER; MAHANA V. UNITED STATES; DUNAWAY ET AL. V. STANDARD OIL CO. (NEW JERSEY) ET AL.; HUNTINGTON PALISADES PROPERTY OWNERS CORP., LTD. V. METROPOLITAN FINANCE CORP.; CONNELLY V. HURLEY ET AL., CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONERS OF CHICAGO; GLISSMANN V. CITY OF OMAHA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sewell v. Pegelow, 291 F.2d 196 (4th Cir. 1961)
  …ct applies to any person within the jurisdiction of the United States.” Siegel v. Ragen, D.C.N.D.Ill.1949, 88 F.Supp. 996, 998, affirmed 7 Cir., 1950, 180 F. 2d 785, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 990, 70 S.Ct. 1015, 94 L.Ed. 139, rehearing denied 1950, 340 U.S. 847, 71 S.Ct. 12, 95 L.Ed. 621. A recent example of judicial intervention on behalf of prisoners who had been unconstitutionally and unlawfully denied rights, is found in Spires v. Dowd, 7 Cir., 1959, 271 F. 2d 659, 661, where it was held that the righ…
• Almond v. Kent, 459 F.2d 200 (4th Cir. 1972)
  …, 84 S.Ct. 97, 11 L.Ed.2d 72 (1963); Beyer v. Werner, 299 F.Supp. 967 (E.D.N.Y.1969); Siegel v. Ragen, 88 F.Supp. 996 (N.D.Ill.1949), aff’d., 180 F. 2d 785 (7 Cir. 1950), cert. den., 339 U.S. 990, 70 S.Ct. 1015, 94 L.Ed. 1391 (1950), rehearing den., 340 U.S. 847, 71 S.Ct. 12, 95 L.Ed. 621 (1950). The district court thought these cases distinguishable, since they concerned statutes making suit by a convict totally impossible; but in McCollum, we observe that the California statute allowed the Adult Authorit…
• Fairbanks v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 191 F.2d 680 (9th Cir. 1951)