JEFFRIES

v.

DUFFY, WARDEN; TAYLOR V. SQUIER, WARDEN; FLEENOR V. HUNTER, WARDEN; POLESKI V. OHIO ET AL.; AND PENTZ V. STEELE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Finn, 341 U.S. 6 (U.S. 1951)
  …omical and sound administration of justice depends to a large degree upon definite and finally accepted principles governing important areas of litigation, such as the respective jurisdictions of federal and state courts, we granted certiorari [*9]. 340 U. S. 849. See also Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corporation, 184 F. 2d 537; Bentley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co., 174 F. 2d 788. I. The removal took place after September 1, 1948, the effective date of the revision of the laws relating to judicial…
• O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1951)
  …ming in them for the rescue of the unknown man was not recreation. It was an act entirely disconnected from any use for which the recreational camp was provided and not in the course of Valak’s employment.” 182 F. 2d 772, 773. We granted certiorari, 340 U. S. 849, because the case brought into question judicial review of awards under the Longshoremen’s Act in light of the Administrative Procedure Act. The Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Act authorizes payment of compensation for “accidental injury or dea…
• United States v. Williams, 341 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1951)
  …acquittal of three of the defendants. Together with Nos. 134 and 365 of this Term, the other two cases growing out of the same affair, we brought the case here because important questions in the administration of civil rights legislation are raised. 340 U. S. 849. The alternative grounds for the decision of the Court of Appeals need not be considered, for we agree that § 241 (to use the current designation for what was § 19 of the Criminal Code) does not reach the conduct laid as an offense in the prosecuti…